Skip to primary content
ConsortiumInfo.org
Search
Sponsored by Gesmer Updegrove
  • Blog
  • About
  • Guide
  • SSO List
  • Meta Library
  • Journal
meta library

Five Reasons Why Patent Disclosure in Standards-Setting Organizations Doesn’t Work (And What to Do Instead)

Title
Five Reasons Why Patent Disclosure in Standards-Setting Organizations Doesn’t Work (And What to Do Instead)
Author
Brad Biddle
Date
8/19/2026
(Original Publish Date: 5/1/2015)
Abstract
Patent “hold up” is a risk associated with standard-setting, and requiring or encouraging disclosure of relevant patents by standards developers is one tool used to mitigate this risk. Disclosure has an intuitive appeal and a strong theoretical justification as a method for addressing an informational asymmetry. This paper argues that disclosure simply does not work as a practical matter, however, for a number of reasons. The paper concludes that disclosure is not an effective tool to address patent hold up, and suggests that other tools (such as enhanced “F/RAND” licensing obligations and improved patent valuation methodologies) should be used instead.
Link
Full Text from SSRN
Technical Areas
  • Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
  • IPR Policies (see also Litigation and Legal Issues)
  • Licensing Models
  • Patents
  • Process of Standard Setting
  • Technical Process
Gesmer Updegrove
  • Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Sitemap